Share |

What do you think of the fact that liberals can cite the official websites of scientific organization?

cato institute
trovalta_stinks_2 asked:

in support of man made global warming,

while conservatives have to resort to citing editorials from political and amateur websites like the CATO Institute, heritage.com, just-boilers.com, junkscience.com, youtube.com, wikipedia.com, etc, etc?

HERE’S MY LIST AGAIN.

NOTE HOW I’M CITING OFFICIAL STATEMENTS DIRECTLY FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AolFInc6ScsWZ2AnrllXxOnsy6IX?qid=20070619060241AAoOEhM
sunshine,

Right… Just part of the vast left-wing conspiracy which includes government organizations, the media, the judges, the economists, the historians, the polling companies, the professors, the universities, the teachers, etc, etc.

I’ve heard it all before.

Everytime cons are proven wrong is because the libs control everything. Only the right-wing pundits are to be trusted apparently.
Jahpson,

The difference is that liberals want to know the truth and go to third party sources to find it,

whereas conservatives just believe what their right-wing pundits tell them regardless of the evidence.

commercial Mortgage