What kind of moron goes to the CATO institute, newsmax.com, and junkscience.com (created by a CATO flunkie) for their global warming news?
Cons do yourselves a favor and go see what the actual scientific organizations are saying. Libs quote scientific organizations. Cons quote a dwindling minority of scientists who have doubts (and do not outright reject man made global warming).
Who has more credibility? The majority of guys with Phds or a small minority?
What makes cons think they are climatic / geologic / meteorologic experts that they can tell the majority of scientific organizations that they are wrong?
I’m no expert either. That is why I trust the scientific consensus on global warming, not the minority.